Hello , just wanne share with you !
 

Yeahhh , I saw a wild vw ,,, and did a Some art !
Hope u like it ,,,, Its not a Vette ,,,lol

Challe / :cheers:

Cool piece of art, although I never understood Bugs... :D

Looks great! :cool:

Thank you Brothers !

Have Fun !
Challe / :cheers:

Time for another Car Art !

Have Fun !
Challe / :D

Challe, where are the Vettes? :scratch:

Nice one! :cool:

Thank you all !

Well , I have asked for great big pics ,,but ,,,,,,,,,,!
I dont just take pics without asking !
So if you post big Pics of your car ,,,, it would be very interesting !

Challe / :D :D

Pictures...

there are two general topics about nice Corvette pictures

http://finnshark.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4624
http://finnshark.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8232

..and my car... for sale, btw

Click the link and then click the pic to enlarge

http://finnshark.com/forum/showpost....10&postcount=2
http://finnshark.com/forum/showpost....10&postcount=6
http://finnshark.com/forum/showpost....10&postcount=7

Are you sure I can use the pics in those links ?
Maybe they get Mad !?

Challe / :viking:

We won't get mad if you won't sell the pictures with your own copyrights.. Just remember that those are not yours. I mean my pictures but I don't know what other members are thinking about using their pics. "Topic Suomalaisille Corvette kuville" is topic for pics which FinnShark members have taken and the other one is general topic just for awesome pictures (Unknown photographers).

So, don't sell your our pictures and everything will be okay. Feel free to create some nice arts for us! :thumrigh:

:cool: Yeahhh Corvette63 !
That will be great !

Challe / :cool:

:salut:

But,

For using pictures from forum members "Tapio.L" and "Toxic Flame", please ask first is it ok. Both of them are professional photographers and I don't know that what do they like about using their pictures. Ok?

Like I said, feel free using mine.

Challe,

there are tons of pictures from me in gallery. LEt me know if there are any pics you want to use. I can even send you the high res ones. ;)

If the picture is posted to a public forum without any notice of copyright...? Why not. The sender has according to my understanding agreed with him/herself that anyone can use the picture... and has by the way accepted the risk of the picture being abused (or in this case "abused" = changed :D :cool: ). Internet is a miracle thing.

But using copyrighted pictures [-X don't do that.

And think that if you make your own drawing you have all rights to it. No matter if you have used some picture/photo from net/magazine/whatever, copyrighted or not. Copyrights apply to the original piece and reproducting/copying it. If you modify some picture you find from net, you can publish it anywhere you like as it was your own.

Of course it is very nice and polite to give credits to the original artist/photographer.

So you think that I can pick some photo for example from Toxic Flame's gallery and make some modifications for it and sell it with my own copyrights for different companies? No way.. I think that the photographer would get really pissed..


And if I take a shot of someones car and put the photo to internet, It's still mine property. Yep, I should know all the risks that someone can save the picture etc., but it's not a sign for anyone that I'll give copyrights for my photos for everybody.

There are hundreds of my pictures in FinnShark's gallery and they all are copyrighted.

As you maybe noticed, there is a little piece of text below the banner:

"Unless otherwise specified, these photos are copyrighted by Riku Loisa and groovyjay. If you wish to use them you must obtain our written permission first."

I am holding copyright to every photo i have taken in my life without c watermarkings or visual copyright markings on them. All kind of commercial abuse is prohibited by finnish law. It is simple as that.

I'm not against private / personal use but if somebody is making money with my pictures then i am willing share of that part too. :D (If it is original photo work of mine.)

But if somebody is making drawings thru my work and selling them, i'd only ask them to send me a one free copy because that is fair enough for my point of wiew.

:salut:

:cool: Thank u guys , But I think its better not to use this picture !
I always ask before I use them !

Thank you and Have Fun !
Challe / :viking:

You are very much allowed to do so. It has to show clear difference between your work and the original image. At the end of the day it is up to the judges to say if it is done right or not, it's a very thin line...

Yes, you have copyright to your photos. BUT if I make a drawing based to your photo I have ALL RIGHTS to that drawing. Even if you can clearly show that I have re-created your photo. By the Finnish law (case Ojutkangas).

You couldn't share other ppls income like I said above.

That's right thing to do, coz' he who makes drawings has all right to those drawings. It doesn't matter if they are "copies" of your photos. Notice that I wrote "copies" not copies. Why? Because those drawings are considered as new independet creations by the Finnish law. No matter if they are direct copies from someones copyrighted photos.

If you are using pen and paper (or watercolors etc.) to create your pictures you can use any photo as a model. By the Finnish law it is. And you have full rights to your drawings/paintings. BUT it is very good to ask photographer if he permits the use AND give credits to original photographer. If photographer says no, it's up to you if you make drawing or not. If u make it, it's not illegal.

I wasn't talking about somebody elses drawings. I was talking only about my own prints as a photowork. You have to modify them pretty harsh/radically to get copyright on your side. Over +60% i'd say by the book of law. In theory. In real life that differs. Like Groovy said it's a very thin line.

Harha said:

"If the picture is posted to a public forum without any notice of copyright...? Why not."

This is wrong. If the art is in internet doesn't mean that they are yours and you can use them as you want. If you take somebody elses property without permission, it's called stealing. You can do it but don't get caught. :D

Sorry, I misunderstood your point of view. Yes, it's not defined how much/little you should modify the original and every case is individual. But (normal) photoshopping usually doesn't fill up the criteria. Even if you prove that you have changed over 60% of the pixels and your re-producted looks (too much) like the original, you have violated copyrights. But if you create exactly original-like picture with pen and paper you don't violate copyrights....

Basicly yes, it is like you said. Copyright must be in effect. If photo has been taken over 50 years ago, it can be used UNLESS it's an artistic photo. Artistic photograph has copyright for 70 years after the creators death. All photographs are not artistic photos in the eyes of the law. But anyway, safe way is NOT to use photos without permission of the photographer.

...The sender has according to my understanding agreed with him/herself that anyone can use the picture... and has by the way accepted the risk of the picture being abused...

So if you park your Corvette outside of your door you will exept that it can be stealed and being abused? Am I Right? Yes.

You understandind in this case is different that finnish copyright law. :rolleyes:

"Tekijänoikeus syntyy aina luotuun kirjalliseen tai taiteelliseen teokseen tekijöille."

http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tekij%C3%A4noikeus

But in U.S these laws are not quite so simple. For example Ford Motor Company steals your copyright. If you take picture about Ford Mustang you are not holding copyright to that art. It's Ford's property.

There is some same kind of examples in Europe too. Like Tower of Eiffel.

I accept the RISK.